rajkotupdates.news : rrr filed pil in Telangana High Court before Release

rajkotupdates.news: rrr filed pil in Telangana High Court before Release

rajkotupdates.news: rrr filed pil in Telangana High Court before Release: Public interest litigation (PIL) has been filed in the Telangana High Court against the film ‘RRR ‘directed by SS Rajamouli—Alluri Soumya of Satyavarapu Andrej Avaram. The petitioner alleged that the movie intentionally distorted the history of Legendary Freedom Fighters – Alluri Sita Ramaraju and Komaram Bheema to insult them and hurt the scores of their followers.

The petitioner demanded that the film and a stay be imposed on the release. The petition came before the bench of Justice Ujjal Bhuiyan and Justice Venkateshwara Reddy to hear the case. Justice Ujjal Bhuyan said the CJ bench would listen to the case since it is a PIL. Rajamouli always maintained that it is a fabricated story about when both the leaders disappeared, and no one knows where they are and what happened to them. The movie was supposed to release on January 7, but the third wave in the country has forced the postponement. It has to be seen what the court decides on this issue.

Telangana High Court Quashes PIL Challenging Stay Order

The Telangana High Court has rejected a request difficult a stay order against SS Rajamouli’s RRR, scheduled to hit theatres in less than ten days. RRR is based on the lives of two imaginary Telugu freedom fighters, Alluri Seetharama Raju and Komaram Bheem. These roles have been played in the show by Ram Charan and Jr NTR, respectively.

Alluri Soumya, a student from Andhra Pradesh, trooped the PIL in January this year, charging that the film distorts historical facts and demanding that a censor certificate should not be issued. Soumya also appealed a stay order on RRR, requesting that the film was destroying the history of the two freedom fighters.

The matter was heard in the Telangana High Court, which ruled in favor of RRR. After hearing arguments from both parties, a bench comprising Chief Justice Satish Chandra and Justice Abhinand Kumar dismissed the petition.

The court observed that the film did not tarnish the freedom fighters’ reputation, as Soumya claimed. In addition, the court also noted that the censor board had emptied the film and given it a censorship certificate.

Apart from Soumya, RRR had also drawn criticism from others who claimed that it distorted historical facts. Veerabhadra Rao, the National President of the Alluri Sita Rama Raju Youth Association, also objected to the film. He said that the filmmakers tweaked the points for commercial gains.

Meanwhile, reports suggest that Rajamouli never claimed that the RRR was based on actual events. He also clarified that it was a fictional work based on actual characters.

Hearing venue of rajkotupdates.news: rrr filed pil in Telangana High Court before Release

Before the film was released, SS Rajamouli’s magnum opus ‘RRR’ featuring Jr NTR and Ram Charan, was challenged in court over its story based on freedom fighters Alluri Sita Ramaraju and Komaram Bheem which to twist. As a result, Alluri Soumya from West Godavari district filed the petition requesting that the film be postponed and not given a censor certificate.

Alluri Soumya holds that this litigation is of public interest, and the court should prevent the release of ‘RRR’ since it destroys the history of Alluri Sita Ramaraju and Kambaram Bheem. She stated that the story behind Alluri Sita Ramaraju had been embellished, making it untrue additionally, in the film, therefore, she believes the movie should not be released.

Produced by DVV Danayya and directed by SS Rajamouli, the film stars NTR and Ram Charan as the lead roles, with Ajay Devgn and Alia Bhatt playing supporting roles. Samuthirakani, Shriya Saran, Ray Stevenson, and Alison Doody also star in various other parts.

There have been several controversies surrounding the movie ‘RRR,’ one of them being its promo featuring a character wearing a skull cap. Siddipet State President and Karimnagar MP Bandi Sanjay took issue with this scene and urged producers to remove it from the film.

However, the court has rejected her appeal and ordered that ‘RRR’ be released. As a result, a CJ tribunal hearing will be held shortly. It will be interesting to observe how this issue is handled.

According to reports, the film will resume shooting on October 22 in Mahabaleshwar. According to the latest update on the shoot, 1000 fighters have been recruited for ‘RRR’s’ action sequence. The new schedule of ‘RRR’ has begun and is already winning viewers’ hearts. Reports indicate that the film will now be shot in Mahabaleshwar and Gujarat.

The decision of  rrr filed pil in Telangana High Court before Release

A Public Interest Lawsuit (PIL) was filed in Telangana High Court by Alluri Sowmya, a student from West Godavari district. She claimed that the depiction of the life history of two freedom fighters in RRR is contrary to their lifestyle and misrepresents reality. In her please, she requested the court to issue a censor certificate and prevent producers from releasing the film.

The petitioner had also expressed dissatisfaction with the portrayal of Martyr Alluri Seetharamaraju as a police officer, which she felt is at odds with his lifestyle. Additionally, she thought the film was damaging Alluri Sita Ramaraju’s image and legacy by portraying her as an ordinary police officer.

SS Rajamouli’s directorial, directed by him, is set for release this year and stars Jr NTR, Ram Charan, and Alia Bhatt in the lead roles. However, it face numerous controversies and was postponed indefinitely due to the increase in cases of the Omicron COVID-19 pandemic.

Telangana BJP chief Bandi Sanjay Kumar recently delivered another blow to the movie by ordering them not to include any visuals featuring Jr NTR wearing a Muslim skull cap in its trailer.

The BJP believes this will cause a deep political rift amongst tribal communities and people across Andhra Pradesh, Telangana, and Maharashtra. Furthermore, the Telangana BJP has threatened to burn down every theatre showing the movie if its character depicts as Muslim.

The Telangana High Court has now directed the filmmakers to re-release the movie if it does not harm Alluri Sita Ramaraju and Komaram Bheem’s image. But they are yet to respond to the court’s order – it will be interesting to see their response

PIL filed against SS Rajamouli’s allegedly distorting Historical Facts

The makers of the magnum opus RRR have landed in a legal soup. After a student from Andhra Pradesh filed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) against the film. Stating that it distorts historical facts.

While filing the PIL. A student from Andhra Pradesh demand a stay order on the film and a censor certificate issued to them. She rubbed the PIL against the producers in the Telangana High Court. In the PIL, she claimed that the film destroyed Alluri Sita Ramaraju and Komaram Bheem’s history.

Meanwhile, director SS Rajamouli had never claimed the film was based on actual events. He had always maintained that the film was fictional and based on real characters. The filmmaker found the story in a period. When no one knew what happened in the lives of those two freedom fighters.

It Stars Ram Charan and Jr NTR as freedom fighters. The film also stars Alia Bhatt and Ajay Devgn in unique appearances. The film supposes to release in theatres on January 7, owing to the surge in COVID-19 cases.

What is Pil?

The Supreme Court noted that Public Interest Litigations (PILs) could become a “tool of blackmail” to target infrastructure projects.

A bench led by Chief Fairness of India DY Chandrachud practical that while hearing an NGO Sarthe Siva Sangh. The HC’s September order is outstanding fine. The supreme court also agreed with the HC’s order for the NGO to pay the fine to. Tata Memorial Hospital in Parel, Mumbai, within two weeks.

“PILs could become an extraction instrument when it is an issue of an organization project. This makes a plank to target such projects. The high court has smelled a rat here.

Who Can File a PIL?

Under Article 32 of the Indian Constitution, in the supreme court. Article 226 in the High Court, and Section 133 of the Criminal Procedure Code in the magistrate court. Any citizen can file a public case by filing a petition.

However, as the letter addresses the aggrieved person. A public-spirited individual. And a social action group for the enforcement of legal or Constitutional rights to any person who is unable to approach the court for redress. The court must satisfy that the Writ petition fulfills some basic requirements for PIL.

A PIL can only bring against the Central, state, or municipal governments and not against any individual. The Governmental and Parliament of India, each State’s Government, and Legislature. All local or other authorities within the territory of India. Or under the control of the Government of India include in the definition of a state.

Conclusion

The court observed that the film did not tarnish the freedom fighters’ reputation, as Soumya claimed. In addition, the court also noted that the censor board had cleared the film and given it a censorship certificate.

Apart from Soumya, RRR had also drawn criticism from others who claimed that it distorted historical facts. Virbhadra Rao, the National President of the Alluri Sita Rama Raju Youth Association, also objected to the film. He said that the filmmakers tweaked the facts for commercial gains.

Meanwhile, reports suggest that Rajamouli never claimed that the RRR was based on actual events. He also clarified that it was a fictional work based on actual characters.